Headlines again this morning regards some vaccine being blamed for deaths from blood clots and the usual suspects quickly wheeled-out to laugh at such a stupid notion being put about by stupid clots. Get that damn jab because the advantages{?} far outweigh the remote possibility of any side effects or death.
So, my question that I’d like our journalistic seekers of truth to ask that Mad Hancock fellow and his SAGGY sidekicks is this: Why is it essential to get the chemi cocktail despite the possibility of short or unknown long term side effects and any deaths relating from said injection are acceptable for ‘the greater good’, but not getting that cocktail thus risking getting something flue like and, if a very bad attack, has a ninety nine plus percent survival rate, is utterly unacceptable?
To put that in a shell wot used to contain a nut, that would be a nut, not a clot, the relatively small percentage of deaths of the huge percentage of folk who’ve ‘shown’ co-co symptoms is unacceptable but the small percentage of deaths of the huge percentage of folk who’ve been punctured and it could be attributed to the chemi cocktail are totally, like, acceptable. Is that an idle swing or a roundabout I see before me? Hello?
Totally, like, off topic, but have you seen that TV advert featuring bling bedecked folk of colour? Apparently, it’s an advert for a fast food delivery service and not, as I first surmised, an advert glorifying thug life...
Found by accident and a tad melancholy, especially after wot’s above, but it do work so damn well for this clown world we’re having to suffer:
Quote; Ed Helms.
“So long as your desire to explore is greater than your desire to not screw up, you’re on the right track.”
No comments:
Post a Comment